Friday, December 08, 2006

Genesis, as Science, Superb!

How could we honor this book as it deserves?

As was to be expected from a true book on the origins of all things, the wealth of information to be found in Genesis is enormous.

Besides theology itself, whether it be cosmology, structuring of complex systems, human psychology, or world historical development everything seems to have been considered in this incredible book, the foundation for the Gospel, for the Apocalypse, and the key to actual wisdom.

If somebody told you, that it's in Genesis that the key to Bible exegesis is to be found, and that the same exegesis applied to world history would lead us to decipher God's will in the discovery of America as a central point in world history, would you believe it?

And would you believe, further discoveries would permit to decipher messages to be clearly written in geography itself, all this with Genesis as the central information source? America was discovered in 1492, but Genesis in full we are just beginning to discover.

In Genesis 2: 19 God presents the methodology for Bible exegesis by granting names the fundamental importance they have. Adam receives from God who proudly presents His creatures to him the additional gift, due to his dignity, of naming them according to his own intelligence of their nature. If the importance of this does not sink in, remember that His great gift to Moses and to the people of Israel was to reveal His name to them. Remember also, that the first thing He did with Abraham was to change his name to give it meaning beyond compare for the old Testament, and that He also changed Abraham's wife's name. It was also by changing names that Jacob became Israel. If you feel this still to be insufficient, just remember how it was that Peter, the apostle, got his name!

Names stand out as acts of God, as parts of Creation from the very first book of Genesis to the book of Revelation, or Apocalypse. In other words, from the very beginning to the very end of the Bible, names are shown to be as fundamental as a true book of origins must hold them to be.

All names, from the most certain—such as day,or night—to the most mysterious such as the name of the Beast in Revelation 13:17. Names that are as nature descriptive as wo-man taken from man, to names encoding the prize for the conqueror in Apocalypse 2:17 "He, that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith to the churches: To him that overcometh, I will give the hidden manna, and will give him a white counter, and in the counter, a new name written, which no man knoweth, but he that receiveth it."

And God, Creator and Redeemer, our Evangelizer would not permit this to go unnoticed and used geography itself to back the record. This is the first convergence, as was to be expected from a true book of origins, the convergence of geography with history. For is not geography the setting for the historical drama that time was meant to deploy?

And what wealth of information for our days!

Would you doubt that Eve was taken from Adam's rib? Then look at Alfred Wegener's theories on the displacement of continents. Notice how South America broke off the African continent. Notice how both South America and Africa resemble hearts—as well as geographical configurations can represent them, roughly—and give and added emphasis to that which is held within the rib cage. You doubt? This is only the beginning.

Let us go to Genesis 3: 15-17, the centrality of which can’t be doubted as it closes a universe and opens another. It closes the earthly Paradise we never knew, that brief era in which God saw all He created and found it good for immortal man, and opens the cursed is the earth for thy sake of sinful, mortal, suffering humanity. The Era of the immediate consequences of sin.

Now, would you believe that Genesis portrays what it says herewith with such precision as to solve the questions it presents? Let us go to the first question, whose heel is the serpent trying to bite, the woman's or her seed's? Question No. 2: Which of the two crushes the serpent's head? Question No. 3: Who is this woman, and who is her seed? Would you believe the answers to be all there? Surprisingly they are! And the story couldn't be more interesting as even the discovery of America happens to reinforce the story beyond mere theory as shall be seen a few paragraphs below.

Upon these fundamental assumptions, it should be more within the expected, than surprising, to have fundamental changes linked to the changes in name to signal the way ahead. And as it was also to be expected, due to the diversity of languages, the main power of the century's language would rule the process. So, for this step of the process you will need a few words from a Spanish dictionary, as Spain was foremost in the 15th century (1492), and was charged with the discovery of the American continent.

The name of two ports are milestone names for Spain as discoverer and conquering power. The first is "Puerto de Palos", literally "Port of Sticks" which was Columbus departing point in 1492, and the port of arrival by Cortez the Conqueror of Mexico in 1521: "Veracruz", a contraction of "Verdadera" and "Cruz" meaning "True Cross". In other words, the mission of discovery and conquest was to move from mere sticks to the True Cross. And this transition would link the three aspects of the Spanish destiny: Discovery, military conquest, and spiritual conquest.

But the surprises are just beginning. In the same way that every milestone name had signified a mission in the Bible; history, God's unfolding of his projects would show his will with force unparalleled. Three ships in a single mission as befits the Trinity’s stamp upon history, and as was to be expected for the singularity of the discovery of America, a mission headed by a man called Christopher in remembrance of the third century Saint who carried the child Jesus through the waters. Christopher means Christ bearer. The name of the three ships can be combined in a single way to form a phrase: "Pinta la Niña Santa María", meaning "Paint the Virgin Mary", since "niña" in Spanish a ‘girl child’ is synonymous with virgin in all languages. This last part has a fundamental importance for the American Continent, as it refers to the miraculous image of the Virgin of Guadalupe, who is Mary, the mother of Jesus and also the triumphant "woman" of Genesis 3: 15.
This requires further elaboration, but you may prefer to have full evidence presented before we enter the Biblical aspects. Both converge in full agreement, making the way we present them of secondary importance.

Columbus of course is Christopher’s last name. From the Italian colombo, from the latin columba (f) or colombinus (m) meaning dove, it is the biblical symbol for the Holy Spirit. From history we have the man. His impressive, outstanding personality among the Grandees of the Spanish Court, and his marvelling others for his personal dedication to the Most Holy Trinity. William Thomas Walsh in his "Isabella of Spain" gives the description of his outstanding qualities.

The first man to sight land for the most famous "Tierra a la vista" in the history of the world was appropriately named Rodrigo de Triana, Rodrigo of Thrice Anne! And St. Anne was Mary Most Holy’s mother! And who is the first to "sight" a baby to be born if not her mother? Checking our geographical configurations we notice Africa to be the larger, more powerful heart of a man; geographically pertaining to The Messiah. South America is a smaller heart, more feminine corresponds to Mary’s heart as would have been perceived by St. Anne! The Woman’s Continent, The Visitation of The Holy Spirit, Christ‘s Gospel carried by Christ Bearer, and the whole mission being mandated by the imperative Paint the Virgin Mary in the Spanish of Columbus’ three Ships! Who ordered that?, all ask in surprise, remember that this hadn’t been noticed for centuries!

More surprises await us! Holy Mary had to stay in America! There was a danger of the three ships returning to Spain normally, to travel back and forth. The original intention coupled to the names would have become trivial! So a miracle enters history, a historical miracle putting Christmas foremost in the picture! At midnight, separating Christmas Eve from Christmas Day of 1492, a gust of wind took the larger ship, the Santa María (the Holy Mary) and stranded it on the beach! A shipwreck! Obviously a large amount of sailors had to remain, and in commemoration the settlement was called Villa de la Navidad, "Christmas Village", and Christmas Fort later on!

Enter Mexico and the Conquerors. The Aztecs had a high opinion of themselves. They considered themselves The People of the Sun as, such was their deity, to whom they sacrificed human victims including themselves, and their blood, to keep the sun in the heavens. They felt elected for such trascendental purpose and the Hebrews felt no greater. The Jews had rejected Christ because of His Cross, and suddenly we find a faraway people of the opposite trend! They have accepted the sacrifice before knowing the Cross of Christ!

Enter geography,
so we may be filled with astonishment at having Genesis 3:15 played over and over, the Rite of the Sun of Aztec delights being repeated every day to answer the questions above as to: The first question, whose heel is the serpent trying to bite, the woman's or her seed's? Question No. 2: Which of the two crushes the serpent's head? Question No. 3: Who is this woman, and who is her seed? The answer had to be there as Italy looks like a boot, a small full legged boot with quite a remarkable heel! My own country--Mexico is much larger--always looked to me like a woman´s shoe, with that long high-heel of the Baja Peninsula. What about the Serpent? The Red Sea of course! Crossed by Moses leading Israel away from the Pharaoh, it holds the Sinai Peninsula between its fangs. The peninsula looks also like a heart, quite a proper place for Moses to receive the Ten Commandments to redress the serpents’ bite which poisoned men’s heart against God!

The Red Sea, from space by NASA

We have thus the daily rite of the sun. The first character to appear at dawn each day (GMT+2:00) is the serpent biting, poisoning the heart of man. It is below the small boot to the east one hour’s time, in a good place to spring upwards like serpents do, to try and bite the little heel. Rome, the capital of Italy and Holy See traditional to the Vicar of Christ receives the sun one hour later (at GM+1). And seven hours later,—the Biblical Seven linked to Genesis as if it were its seal—the sun rises over Mexico City (at GMT-6) where Mary of Guadalupe appeared to Juan Diego. Below Mexico, Central America, again the serpent, is crushed this time by the woman’s high heeled shoe which has the added weight of the Boiling Pot with its handle being Florida.
The Italian Boot from space by NASA

This clarifies all Genesis 3:15. While the serpent tries to bite the Child Jesus’ heel, and before it manages to do so, there comes Mother and crushes its head! If you ever wondered why Rome, and why the pope has to be in Rome, you have it there!

Add to all this that both images, the Holy Shrowd and the Image of Mary of Guadalupe, came to be within the Julian Calendar, 33 A.D. and 1531 A.D. The calendar named for Julius Cesar with the same initials as Jesus Christ was set up shortly before 33 A.D. , only to fall on behalf of the Gregorian Calendar shortly after 1531. This will help you sort out the truth of both images being of supernatural origin, and therefore the opposite of what "Public Opinion" as mass media try to make them out to be.

If you ever wondered why all the fuss about the Holy Shroud, here you have it!

God’s presence in history for this message is unmistakable! For who could arrange everything so? And there is still so much more to it, including the heavens and the name of the Constellations of December skies over Mexico City!

As Gamaliel timely warned them: Beware, least you find yourselves fighting God!

Let’s see some theology now, and what better moment than this to emphasize again the phenomenal precision of Genesis? It’s in Genesis 3: 15 where the Lord sentenced: "Enmity shall I put between thee and the woman, and between your seed and her seed; she shall crush thy head, whilst thou attempts to bite his heel". The first phrase is astonishing, a woman making the worst decision conceivable has self destroyed by falling into a trap, and weakened to the very foundations of her being hears of another woman that will avenge her. But, what kind of woman can this be? What kind of strength can she have to face Satan single-handedly and crush his head?

Genesis itself had provided the answer beforehand and in a single paragraph!

It’s all in Genesis 1:26-27, which in 27: "God created man in His own image, in the image of God created He him; male and female created He them."

It must be here stated that in the ability to read, as in all things, competence is the opposite of incompetence, and there is not much middle ground! If you got the slightest idea of the power of God by reading from Genesis 1:1-27, the effect of his Word creating everything, you must grant the image of His power, power! Power befitting His image! Or, does someone find reading that difficult? Take note of: "And Jesus answering, said to them: Amen, I say to you, if you shall have faith, and stagger not, not only this of the fig tree shall you do, but also if you shall say to this mountain, Take up and cast thyself into the sea, it shall be done." Of course it's already in Genesis! If you are so unlucky as to belong to the reading school of the Reformers you’ve been lost from Genesis on!

Now here is the full traditional Catholic reading: Omnipotence is unfailing. It can’t be frustrated by a fallen angel and his accomplices, thus the fall of Adam and Eve was the backdrop for the exaltation of the New Adam, and the New Eve that were from Eternity in the mind of God.

For the perfect Image of God was not to leave ‘woman’ out, as Genesis—the book of origins—established from the beginning: "male and female created He them". The perfect image in Mary Most Holy with the corresponding power is perfectly stated in her Magnificat (Luke 1:48) in which "for He has looked upon the humiliation of His slave" states clearly—His slave—that Mary Most Holy never exercised her will as her own, she did only God’s will, developing fully only His will in her, and you must remember His will is Almighty! Thus her power, her greatness, her being second only to God!

Mary Most Holy gave an inkling of this to Italian Luisa Picarreta around fifty years ago by saying You have no idea of what it means to never, not even once do your own will. This self denial can be tougher than all the penances of the saints, more painful by the Cross than the sum of the torments of the martyrs.

Yes, there is nothing in Christianity without merit, but Christian merit has incomparable rewards!

Christ´s words: "Not everyone that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter the Kingdom of Heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in Heaven" (Matthew 7:21) are exalting His mother with himself for doing so, establishing our only passport to His Kingdom, and utterly destroying sola fide! The Fall, Original Sin, devastated the Original Image in man and in woman, thus, a recreation was in order for both, man and woman in Jesus and Mary! For such is in Genesis!

We have a much better understanding from Genesis 3:15, known as the First Announcement of the Good News, or Proto-Evangelium, of the Triumphant Woman that exercises God’s Divine Vengeance on man’s enemy. She is a special Creation to give birth to The Eternal, to give a Mother to The Unbegotten. To have God’s power for having only The Almighty Will for her only will. We have her so that God could have a Mother He could give us for a Mother.

The perfection of God’s realized plan for an intercessor to whom nothing could be denied in the heart of a mother, this mother being His very own.

And the new understanding that Paradise Regained from Paradise Lost could only be from Nature Restored as only the perfect can enter Heaven. In other words, Paradise Lost presented no problem, it was Nature lost to animal nature that destroyed God’s perfect image and became a total impediment for mankind’s final glory.

Thus Christ’s words: Be perfect as your Father in Heaven is perfect, are not a mere suggestion but an absolute command emphasizing restoration! The need to be born again from water and from the Spirit, and of the Church He founded on the Model of His own Family in sexless purity through the vowed and sworn chastity of His clergy, is an essential part to separate his clergy from the devil’s plan, from the devil's plot, for it’s only after the fall and after the sentence that Adam knew Eve, and the first fruit of sex was a murderer!

Sex is being pushed on all! Abortion is being pushed on all! Sexual degeneracy is being pushed on all! A murderous, sadistic, assault upon the spirit! It’s Satan’s plan. We need an exemplary clergy in its sworn chastity more than ever before to free humanity from this corruption!

Honor to Mary Most Holy, December 8th 2006, festivity of her Immaculate Conception.

Sunday, December 03, 2006

Evolution or Creation? A Definitive Statement.

The Origins: Genesis and its contender

The beginning is half the whole, says an old adage, and you agree with this every time you refuse to enter a movie halfway through, or to begin reading a novel at the middle. But are we always so logical? Our instinct tells us that we cannot prescind from the information available at the beginning, or from reasoning in sequential steps. Cause and effect sequences have to be revised for us to keep a firm grip on our logical processes. Take the example: Why can't we find a man as large as a whale? The obvious answer: Because there is no couple hefty enough to beget one whale sized tells the whole story.

This type of direct relationship between cause, as sufficient cause, to all possible effects is the most elementary means available to all to discard idiocy from theories. Or at least it should be! But it isn't! And no better proof can be obtained of this anomaly than the success of Charles Darwin and his subservient mental clones, and their successful invasion and conquest of the scientific establishment.

Using the same commonsense capable of reducing whale's size to baby sized, we can always be certain of the difference between the possible and the impossible. We know only too well that it is as easy to take less from more as it is impossible to take more from less. The theory of evolution, however, demands the opposite. And not as a single happenstance but as a natural law, and in an unending flow of new living species always better than their ancestors, leaving us undecided as to what to admire more if the unrestricted optimism or the sheer folly, for greater optimism had never been seen, and a more monumental stupidity has never been thought! If you like to dream every night of putting ten dollars into your pockets to awaken with the gross national product as the fruits thereof, believe me you're not beating Darwin's optimism, or his idiocy.

And no matter how you wish to put it, how you wish to embellish, adorn it or reinvent it, it boils down to just that!

There is always only one logic and you can’t beat it. If you empty a pocket or a purse in order to put in ten dollars, you can’t bring out eleven dollars without creating a dollar out of nothing! Impossible! If it’s a savings account paying a dollar interest you are still taking out less than was put in, for what was put in to generate that extra dollar was not only ten dollars, but also the bank, the bank’s activities, the market, risk and time. A lot more than your savings plus a dollar was put in! No way for Darwinian Mechanics on that basis to be right, but rather worse as bankruptcies often add in cruel remembrances. When all’s considered even Central Banking humbled lies.

So Darwin had ideas! Did his ideas create all things? Or were ‘All Things’ he sought to structure, by some one else as structures made? The mechanism he sought to explain, who invented, created, and put to work such thing?

When you get down to Darwin, his crazy clones et al; you must depart from origins, to fantasize on mechanisms lacking a previous plan. For plans come from ideas, and whose idea was that? Mechanism unplanned, from no previous idea and from no previous mind? No matter how you embellish it, or how you wish to prove it, it all boils down to that!

So, what is all the fuss about?

FALLING FROM TREES: From Newtons apple, to Darwin’s rather brusque descent.

Two Britons, both to be remembered as connected by gravitational happenstance. The apple to honor Isaac, as often said: many apples have fallen on men’s heads but there was only one Newton! In relation to Darwin, since his "The Descent of Man" it has often been said lacking apples in his case, that the main suspect was he, and falling down squarely on his head!

Darwin’s case admits a better description using hallucinogenic drugs and mushrooms which were possibly not known in his time, but are better fitted to the way his observations were magnified out of proportion and then fitted into theory. For he awed for the commonplace, gaped at trivia, and exaggerated like mad.

Poor Darwin's substance
He noticed variability within species! He observed offspring resembling parents not to be identical to them! He also noticed an inheritance factor in the offspring! He realized some individuals were better fitted for survival, and were better breeders! He observed what animal breeders did in selecting the desirable traits to better the desired qualities in each succeeding generation: scent in dogs, for example! He then transposed this artificial selection to nature to present his readers with nature having precisely the breeder’s savvy and good intentions to force in a few pages a natural selection! Due to nature not having gone to the breeders’ school—nor likely most of his readers— in order to tighten on the ‘natural adaptation and survival of the fittest’, nature could be considered to be as aggressive and unreliable as needed to force changes within the theory’s laxity! And then he simply introduced the biggest blunder conceivable, a blunder extant still in the minds of all his victims: he mistook transformation for evolution!

"What Mr. Darwin seems to have forgotten—he was immediately told—is that we, the English, a nation of breeders of horses and dogs —and of such competence in the field as nobody has yet dared to question— despite our competence have never yet seen a horse become more than a horse, or a dog become more than a dog".—The English press was denying transformism which Darwin had sneaked in as evolution!

Of course there is a natural selection! Of course there is a survival of the fittest! But there is no place for Darwin in this picture! When a cheetah attacks a Thompson gazelle at close to sixty miles an hour, and the lighter gazelle responds accelerating to close to fifty miles per hour, artfully dodging the heavier predator, and getting away many times, they are acting out these very principles; but in a way barely sufficient to keep in shape as any jogger knows only too well. Neither will the jogger find himself either suddenly— or eonly in far away descendants in long traditional practice— flying blue-streak away from kryptonite, nor will the cheetah acquire its wings! There is, and this must be emphasized, an enormous difference between true science always capable of proof and better sense, and the falsifiers of true science building tall-tales, and by rattling a few old fossil bones manage to devastate the human mind.

If you have begun to suspect that the idea behind it is to use the joyful strengths of optimism to demolish the sanity of our Christian civilization, congratulations, it's a bull's-eye! If, on the other hand you think you are discovering how easy it is to make dupes of the masses, you are too late for that! It was joyfully announced by Randolph Hearst circa 1900 when he said: "The truth said once is soon forgotten, but a lie repeated a hundred times becomes public opinion." And the best definition of the worst type of public opinion, the mind devastative public opinion is what they incessantly hammer in as "Evolution"... But fortunately there is the Genesis connection!

In the same way black must contrast white to build meaningful grayscale, against the backdrop of the only contender: the most ridiculous, counter-logical and unscientific darwinian and post darwinian theory or evolution, Genesis was there to shine forth radiantly. Enter "The Days of Creation":

Days or eons?
Ecology is the epitome of complexity, built up with uncountable millions of living creatures engaged in uncountable checks and balances, yet they have a fundamental need of simultaneousness. Every prey-predator pair has to coexist in space and time for the predators to survive. It’s inescapable! Contrariwise to Darwinian madness denying limitations and restrictive origins, in order to postulate unplanned systems of uncharted complexity and everything fueled by senseless optimism, we must begin by getting a feel of the problem. Can we? Will we know where to begin?

A black box is a mental construct to reduce mind boggling problems to manageable proportions, basically to an input-output formulation. Our basic input will be pairs, prey-predator pairs. The moment we begin feeding our basic input we begin to get a feeling of what an excessively complex dynamic interactive system implies, specially when the interactive part enters the equation! To simplify, the basic parameters will be space, time and simultaneousness. But on introducing the first pair, let’s say cheetah-gazelle, we realize we cannot even calculate an optimal population without a better knowledge of the entourage which is there for much greater complexity! With each and every additional living creature complicating in uncharted ways the whole situation! A situation in which we do not even know which if any should be the first pair to enter our blackbox to output at every point a stable system! The key, however, is stability through interaction at each step of the process even if we don’t know the number of pairs per species, or the adequate order for their introduction! It is beyond our competence, but the keys for understanding are all there.

We face an equilibrium problem which minimized in complexity resembles an old mattress for which fixing one spring can lead to several other springing out of place. How can we go about it? Old mattresses do get fixed, but springs are few and species uncountable; springs are elementary, species exceedingly complex. If old mattresses were more complex nobody would ever even think of fixing them, as new mattresses offer the advantage of simultaneous placement of all their springs, pointing again, even for the simplest systems to the advantage of simultaneousness! Precisely the same requirement with which we began by saying: Every prey-predator pair has to coexist in space and time for the predators to survive. It’s inescapable! The other two problems: prey-predator ratio, and order of each prey-predator pair introduction can also be solved, most elegantly by simultaneousness! In other words: Take everything as is, and then, have it set up instantaneously! Given sufficient power as only God can have, elegance and project feasibility both fall directly to the side of The Days of Creation. Complete sets are ordered into being and put in place in a fuss-less manner! And our intermediate mental crutch, the black box imaginary construct can be happily discarded!

But, will we be taken seriously on this point in a scientific discussion?

In scientific debate yes, and on two additional counts: Firstly, you only have to take a short Wikipedia tour of the Big-Bang to realize that not only nature was set up without having to fuss up to eons galore, but that the whole universe was created instantaneously!

Adding eons you put in NOTHING NEW! You merely admit a trade-off to cooling expansion (more space, less heat, and the logical consequences thereof).

Secondly, by analogy to all excessively complex dynamic interactive systems take the one most familiar to you, the almost instantaneous formation of the human baby. If you think nine months is incompatible to instantaneousness, just consider the explosive cell growth from two human cells to more than a trillion cells in nine months!

Better still, try to extend the precise time required from nine months to... as much as you desire in order to better admire the precision of Genesis in its days of Creation!... Only remember: the nine months are mere expansion to what was already potentially there in the instantaneous fusion between the ovum and the spermatozoid!

From the first paragraph above on whale sized creatures: What is not potentially there, at the inception, will never be. In other words my dear Darwinian clone, sorry, you’ll never become a kangaroo!

To wit, potential requires no time, only its realization through successive actualizations!

To seek God for a religious reason is commonplace. We have the Church, the Bible, and the doctors of the Church. We also have preachers, schools and universities. For the origins we have Genesis. Nobody thought of questioning Him directly; but He came to us with the answer as He always has... Maria Valtorta, Italian mystic translated to more than ten different languages transcribed Jesus Christ’s words on the subject as follows: "In relation to that grave error, which has caused so much damage, not only it’s impossible for a monkey to evolve into a man; but not even with all your technology can you reduce a man to a monkey. You may maim and degrade him, but no matter what you do a monkey you will not get, because the monkey has its own perfection!

This is the definitive statement on two counts: First, we have already seen the impossibility for any evolutionary theory succeeding on account that no mechanism—natural or otherwise—can create something out of nothing, or permit in any way to take out more than was put in. Not for a single case, least of all on a regular, constant basis. We were however leaving open a possibility to the opposite, to have a lesser creature derive from a superior one.

The above statement closes out any such possibility on the basis of perfection. A distinct perfection. A closed perfection as corresponds to a distinct species.

Secondly: The above statement brings to our attention the perfection of each species as such. Perfection can’t be bettered or it wouldn’t be perfection! In other words: the perfection of each species lies in the unalterable fullness of each species. It was bad enough to pretend a mechanism bringing into existence any enhancement implying something not potentially in its inception, but to demand the same mechanism to produce perfection in all cases? Well, there are straightjackets, you know....

Much damage is mentioned as the result of preaching or accepting Evolution. And it is easy to see where the damage is made, and which results can be further expected. We can recognize the most serious assault on human reason, and an open imposition by political and financial power to impair thinking. Logical cause to effect is abolished, proportions loose all relevance, and unfounded optimism is presented as omnipotence. Everything good can be expected without effort or merit. Only rights and no duties rule for progress, and progress and blind optimism are one. The only needed force is sex, and singly exalted, responsibility for offspring can be better waylaid to natural selection. The laws of the jungle function optimally above human law. Bestiality can have no substitute in evolutionary thinking, if it got us here, evolutionaries seem to say, why not only bestiality? Why not proclaim it king? The apocalyptic beast has been unleashed!